On the Fragility of Tasks under Composition: Implicit Budgeting in Language Models
Modern language models are increasingly asked to handle several tasks within a single prompt.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Doing so requires solving each task correctly while integrating the resulting answers into a coherent response.
- In this paper, we identify a fundamental limitation in this process, where models make substantially more errors when tasks are composed, even when they can solve every constituent task reliably in isolation.
- Across both open-weight models and the frontier model Claude Opus 5, our findings instead point to an implicit thinking budget underlying this effect.
- However, by grouping tasks according to their fragility, the implicit budgeting can be manipulated to reduce token usage by 43\% across a range of math and linguistic tasks while also preserving accuracy.
Sources (2)
- [1]On the Fragility of Tasks under Composition: Implicit Budgeting in Language ModelsHugging Face Daily Papers · Oct 19, 12:00 AM
Modern language models are increasingly asked to handle several tasks within a single prompt.
Doing so requires solving each task correctly while integrating the resulting answers into a coherent response.
- [2]On the Fragility of Tasks under Composition: Implicit Budgeting in Language ModelsarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 19, 07:23 PM · same content
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 18, 2026Bud ContextCompact 2.0: Context Compaction for Agent Success and Accuracy with Small Language Models and Constrained Context Windows
- Oct 17, 2026Efficiency Measured in English: Tokeniser Coverage Bounds Small Language Models on Indic Scripts
- Oct 17, 2026deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Oct 17, 2026Nemotron 3.5 Bolt, Muse Spark Open, and a Fast LFM2.5 24B
- Oct 16, 2026Welcome Beam: a 501B open model you can own, customize, and scale
- Oct 16, 2026DLite: History-free Speculative Decoding for Agentic AI