The Geometry of Agent Memory: Forecasting Retrieval-Bound Memory Failures, and Characterizing Its Limits
We study whether geometric relationships between conversation turns, memory texts, and queries can predict answer correctness before generation.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- We evaluate four memory implementations with dense or hybrid retrieval and one observation-summary comparator.
- A logistic classifier uses 25 features describing query proximity, memory-conversation correspondence, and conversation structure.
- A fixed-store context-selection experiment finds higher accuracy with proximity-ranked memories than with random subsets, consistent with ordinary retrieval relevance.
- The results characterize associations between memory representations and correctness, rather than establish a reliable deployment diagnostic.
Sources (1)
- [1]The Geometry of Agent Memory: Forecasting Retrieval-Bound Memory Failures, and Characterizing Its LimitsarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 19, 01:56 PM
We study whether geometric relationships between conversation turns, memory texts, and queries can predict answer correctness before generation.
We evaluate four memory implementations with dense or hybrid retrieval and one observation-summary comparator.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 19, 2026VerifierBench: Benchmarking the Generation of Executable Verifiers for LLM Agents
- Oct 18, 2026Editing as Language: Teaching LLM Agents a Grammar for Native Context Editing
- Oct 18, 2026System X: An LLM Decision Model That Replies from Its Own KV Cache
- Oct 18, 2026MemPrice: Online Memory Allocation via Adaptive Pricing for Long-Horizon Agents
- Oct 17, 2026EdgeKernelBench: Unified LLM-Driven Kernel Generation for Edge Backends
- Oct 16, 2026[Research] 2,788 tokens/s on a single RTX 5090 with a diffusion LLM — Introducing ORL (fully open source)