StepBench: Diagnosing Real-World Procedural Understanding in AI Agents
We introduce STEPBENCH, a benchmark of 6,885 verified procedures crawled from wikiHow across 81 open-domain categories.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Evaluating an agent's planning ability remains challenging for open-domain tasks, where verifying procedures through execution is often impractical.
- We additionally evaluate full-plan generation to examine how diagnostic performance correlates with end-to-end plan validity.
- For generation, STEPEVAL identifies critical failures that prevent goal completion.
- Across 14 configurations of 12 models, we find substantial differences across planning capabilities, with step ordering proving the most difficult: the strongest model correctly orders only 63.0% of procedures, dropping to 33.1% for those with nine or more steps.
Sources (1)
- [1]StepBench: Diagnosing Real-World Procedural Understanding in AI AgentsarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 19, 04:27 PM
We introduce STEPBENCH, a benchmark of 6,885 verified procedures crawled from wikiHow across 81 open-domain categories.
Evaluating an agent's planning ability remains challenging for open-domain tasks, where verifying procedures through execution is often impractical.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 19, 2026MiniMax M3.1 Flash shows China's AI price race has no floor in sight
- Oct 19, 2026NVIDIA Cosmos3-H-Dreams: Bringing Clinical Surgery to Life Through Generative Simulation
- Oct 18, 2026Google Open-Sources Harness2, a Recursive Agent Harnessing Framework
- Oct 18, 2026P2N: Reusing Deep Representations for Greater Effective Depth
- Oct 17, 2026Nemotron 3.5 Bolt, Muse Spark Open, and a Fast LFM2.5 24B
- Oct 17, 2026Muse Glimmer 30B: An On-Device Agentic Model