Minimax-Optimal Predictive Flow Matching under Distribution Drift
Flow matching learns a generative velocity field by regression, but under distribution drift a field must be deployed before the current data arrive.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- We study this predictive problem for a fixed, possibly nonconvex, neural class, with dynamic regret against the best represented field of each round.
- We propose DyProd-FM, which refits flow matching on dyadic historical prefixes and selects among the fits with a sleeping Prod master.
- Without knowing any drift budget, it attains regret $\widetilde{O}(\min\{Nω+1,1+\sqrt{TΩ}\})$ in the relative velocity risk variation $Ω$ and $\widetilde{O}(\min\{Nμ+1,1+T^{1/3}Vμ^{2/3}\})$ in the target-law variation $Vμ=\sumt W2(μ{t+1},μt)$, up to approximation and fitting costs.
- Matching lower bounds for fixed classes show that both rates are optimal in $T$ and in the budgets up to logarithmic factors.
Sources (1)
- [1]Minimax-Optimal Predictive Flow Matching under Distribution DriftarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 20, 08:22 PM
Flow matching learns a generative velocity field by regression, but under distribution drift a field must be deployed before the current data arrive.
We study this predictive problem for a fixed, possibly nonconvex, neural class, with dynamic regret against the best represented field of each round.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 20, 2026UniWALM: Unified World Action Language Model for Embodied Robot Control
- Oct 20, 2026Gradium Open-Sources Phonon, a 31M-Parameter On-Device TTS Model Under Apache 2.0
- Oct 20, 2026Kratos vs Teddy bear minimax
- Oct 19, 2026Space Bunny was MiniMax M3.1 Flash. 428B-A23B, weights drop Thursday
- Oct 19, 2026MiniMax M3.1 Flash shows China's AI price race has no floor in sight
- Oct 19, 2026Are the days of free open-source and shareware over?