On the Necessity of Attention-FFN Split in Vision Transformers
In this work, we investigate the necessity of the Attention-FFN dichotomy in Vision Transformers (ViTs).
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- The standard Transformer architecture relies on a rigid pattern that alternates Attention and Feed-Forward Network (FFN) layers.
- To facilitate this analysis, we introduce the AttenFeed module, a unified component that integrates the functional properties of both Attention and FFN.
- Based on this module, we devise the unified Vision Transformer (uViT), which replaces the conventional alternating Attention-FFN structure with a sequence of AttenFeed modules.
- Our experiments reveal that the Attention-FFN dichotomy can hinder performance at smaller model scales due to the rigid parameter allocation of ViTs.
Sources (1)
- [1]On the Necessity of Attention-FFN Split in Vision TransformersarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 7, 03:57 PM
In this work, we investigate the necessity of the Attention-FFN dichotomy in Vision Transformers (ViTs).
The standard Transformer architecture relies on a rigid pattern that alternates Attention and Feed-Forward Network (FFN) layers.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 7, 2026Iris-3B: Going Beyond the Latent with Pixel-Space Diffusion Training, Conversion and Fine-Tuning
- Oct 6, 2026openbmb/MiniCPM-V-4.7-35B-A3B-gguf
- Oct 6, 2026huggingface/transformers v5.19.0: Release v5.19.0
- Oct 6, 2026EmbeddingGemma 2: an open, lightweight multimodal embedding model
- Oct 6, 2026Test-Time Adaptation of Quantized ViTs via Single-Pass Quantizer-Aligned Recalibration
- Oct 5, 2026LiquidAI/d1-omni-600M