MathVis: Can AI Reason through Drawing? A Benchmark for Mathematical Figure Generation
This paper introduces MathVis, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' ability to visualize frontier mathematical problems and perform diagram-assisted reasoning.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- The benchmark consists of 512 tasks, each comprising a mathematical statement, a reference diagram, executable TikZ or SVG code, a Gold Intermediate Representation (IR), atomic rubrics, and error codes.
- Through rigorous evaluation, GPT-6-Astra, Claude Fable 5, and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview achieve pass@1 scores of 31.25%, 26.56%, and 22.85%, respectively.
- We found that although the tasks require visualization, LLMs produce outputs dominated by formal languages, symbols, and graphics programs, rather than explicit diagram-mediated reasoning.
- Ultimately, this benchmark aims to visualize mathematical problems and promote research on enabling LLMs to simplify their reasoning via visual diagrams.
Sources (1)
- [1]MathVis: Can AI Reason through Drawing? A Benchmark for Mathematical Figure GenerationarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 9, 03:52 AM
This paper introduces MathVis, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' ability to visualize frontier mathematical problems and perform diagram-assisted reasoning.
The benchmark consists of 512 tasks, each comprising a mathematical statement, a reference diagram, executable TikZ or SVG code, a Gold Intermediate Representation (IR), atomic rubrics, and error codes.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 8, 2026[AINews] not much happened today
- Oct 8, 2026Understanding Jev, the new model everyone is talking about
- Oct 8, 2026Text is so 2023
- Oct 8, 2026Google brings agentic AI to Gemini, starting with businesses
- Oct 8, 2026Launching an opt-in vulnerability-finding service for open-source software
- Oct 7, 2026[AINews] Claude Haiku 5.5 — better than GPT-6 Luna at the same pricing