SCOPE Before You Sample: Conformal Scores Guide Posterior Exploration for Fast and Calibrated Bayesian Predictive Inference
We propose SCOPE (Score-guided Conformal Posterior Exploration), which retains the predictive quality of full MCMC while achieving calibrated coverage at a fraction of its cost.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Bayesian predictive regions account for parameter uncertainty but can be poorly calibrated under model misspecification, even with expensive full MCMC.
- SCOPE gives nonconformity scores a new role in guiding posterior computation: score gradients on a held-out guide set, weighted toward the target boundary, identify the relevant directions.
- We establish asymptotic coverage for SCOPE and provide a split variant with finite-sample validity.
- Controlled simulations show that score-guided exploration yields more accurate calibrated regions than non-targeted direction choices at low active rank.
Sources (1)
- [1]SCOPE Before You Sample: Conformal Scores Guide Posterior Exploration for Fast and Calibrated Bayesian Predictive InferencearXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 12, 05:27 PM
We propose SCOPE (Score-guided Conformal Posterior Exploration), which retains the predictive quality of full MCMC while achieving calibrated coverage at a fraction of its cost.
Bayesian predictive regions account for parameter uncertainty but can be poorly calibrated under model misspecification, even with expensive full MCMC.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 12, 2026[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
- Oct 12, 2026Amortised adaptive importance sampling
- Oct 12, 2026$\texttt{NFDiag}$: High-dimensional MCMC Convergence Diagnosis with Normalizing Flows
- Oct 12, 2026Locally adaptive step sizes for Hamiltonian Monte Carlo methods
- Oct 10, 2026Belief Embedding Tree Search
- Oct 10, 2026Physics-informed random neural architectures on compact boundaryless multiply connected manifolds for random-operator models in machine learning and uncertainty quantification