Optimizing Large Language Models with Chained LMOs
We introduce chained linear minimization oracles (chained LMOs), which cast these methods as compositions of LMOs.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Muon has motivated a growing family of optimizers that compose multiple matrix normalizations, but these methods remain fragmented and lack a unified perspective.
- To explain why composition can nevertheless help, we turn to linear associative memory and show that chaining can improve over Muon under anisotropic embeddings.
- Empirically, we propose TensorChain, a novel optimizer within the framework that stacks compatible weight matrices across different layers and normalizes the 3d tensor across its axes.
- In Qwen3 0.6B and 1.7B pretraining, TensorChain outperforms all chained baselines in average token efficiency, with average token savings of 9.6% over Muon at matched validation loss.
Sources (1)
- [1]Optimizing Large Language Models with Chained LMOsarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 7, 10:56 PM
We introduce chained linear minimization oracles (chained LMOs), which cast these methods as compositions of LMOs.
Muon has motivated a growing family of optimizers that compose multiple matrix normalizations, but these methods remain fragmented and lack a unified perspective.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 7, 2026Iris-3B: Going Beyond the Latent with Pixel-Space Diffusion Training, Conversion and Fine-Tuning
- Oct 6, 2026huggingface/transformers v5.19.0: Release v5.19.0
- Oct 6, 2026huggingface/diffusers v0.41.0: Diffusers 0.41.0: QwenImage 2.1 pipeline and more
- Oct 6, 2026[AINews] Reflection Beam - 501B-A23B American Open Model
- Oct 6, 2026VisionWeave: Weaving Elastic Visual Representations as a Native Capability of MLLMs
- Oct 6, 2026CARE: Certifying Acceleration for Vision-Language-Action Inference