Re-executing Coding-Agent Evaluations: Unchanged Decisions and Unresolved Policy Risk
Executable tests grade large language model (LLM) coding-agent patches for leaderboards, rewards and self-improvement.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Two preregistered re-execution studies returned negative results.
- SWE-bench Pro v1's offline option rejected none of 59 accepted Go patches whose grading configuration changed.
- Re-executing 1,929 selected agent-version/task evaluations from the Darwin Gödel Machine's archive preserved best-agent selection and system-variant ranking, with search history and scores of evaluations not rerun fixed.
- We provide an evidence-to-claim summary, lessons for grader audits and an anonymous replication package.
Sources (1)
- [1]Re-executing Coding-Agent Evaluations: Unchanged Decisions and Unresolved Policy RiskarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 10, 01:38 AM
Executable tests grade large language model (LLM) coding-agent patches for leaderboards, rewards and self-improvement.
Two preregistered re-execution studies returned negative results.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 10, 2026PANINI-DR: Controlled Deep Research through Generative Semantic Workspaces
- Oct 9, 2026PILOT: Guiding Long-Horizon World-Model Planning for Robot Manipulation with Visual Subgoals and Policy Priors
- Oct 9, 2026Not All Correct Fixes Run Alike: An Empirical Study of Patch Performance in Repository-Level Issue Resolution
- Oct 8, 2026Meta-Reflective Evolution Effectively Improves Production AI Systems
- Oct 8, 2026The State of AI Report 2026
- Oct 8, 2026ConwayResearch/Underdog-Saluki-27B-1.0