ResearchResearch paperReinforcement Learning · Large Language Models · Safety & Alignment1 source · Oct 10, 2026

Re-executing Coding-Agent Evaluations: Unchanged Decisions and Unresolved Policy Risk

Executable tests grade large language model (LLM) coding-agent patches for leaderboards, rewards and self-improvement.

Key points

  • Two preregistered re-execution studies returned negative results.
  • SWE-bench Pro v1's offline option rejected none of 59 accepted Go patches whose grading configuration changed.
  • Re-executing 1,929 selected agent-version/task evaluations from the Darwin Gödel Machine's archive preserved best-agent selection and system-variant ranking, with search history and scores of evaluations not rerun fixed.
  • We provide an evidence-to-claim summary, lessons for grader audits and an anonymous replication package.

Sources (1)

Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.

Before this

  1. Oct 10, 2026PANINI-DR: Controlled Deep Research through Generative Semantic Workspaces
  2. Oct 9, 2026PILOT: Guiding Long-Horizon World-Model Planning for Robot Manipulation with Visual Subgoals and Policy Priors
  3. Oct 9, 2026Not All Correct Fixes Run Alike: An Empirical Study of Patch Performance in Repository-Level Issue Resolution
  4. Oct 8, 2026Meta-Reflective Evolution Effectively Improves Production AI Systems
  5. Oct 8, 2026The State of AI Report 2026
  6. Oct 8, 2026ConwayResearch/Underdog-Saluki-27B-1.0

Related