Teaching Vision-Language Models to Decline: Support Completion Against Mirage
Vision-language models answer questions about images they were never shown, a failure called mirage.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Such an answer can be correct without being justified by the evidence, and the difference matters wherever a model's output is checked by someone who did not see its input.
- We locate the failure in the training objective: cross-entropy separates a model that reads the image from one that ignores it by only the conditional mutual information between answer and image, and no training example rewards declining.
- The four-condition protocol on three base models, with seeds and component ablations, is in progress and not reported here.
Sources (1)
- [1]Teaching Vision-Language Models to Decline: Support Completion Against MiragearXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 12, 09:21 AM
Vision-language models answer questions about images they were never shown, a failure called mirage.
Such an answer can be correct without being justified by the evidence, and the difference matters wherever a model's output is checked by someone who did not see its input.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 12, 2026AReA: Adaptive Receptive-Field Attention for Efficient High-Resolution Diffusion Transformers
- Oct 12, 2026TPPO: Tracking-Value PPO For Language Model Reasoning
- Oct 11, 2026autotrust/JEV-35B-NVFP4
- Oct 10, 2026vllm-sr/d3
- Oct 10, 2026What Really Works for Universal Multimodal Embeddings? A Controlled Study of Contrastive Training Strategies
- Oct 9, 2026nvidia/Qwen-Image-NVFP4