Deep Learning for Atmospheric Turbulence Mitigation: A Comparison Between GANs and Transformers
This work compares two deep learning methods for turbulence reduction: Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Transformer-based models.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Atmospheric turbulence creates complex spatial and temporal distortions that significantly reduce image quality.
- Our results show an important finding: GAN-based models perform better in severely degraded, low-quality situations, while Transformer-based models achieve better results in moderate to high-quality settings, especially in correcting geometric distortions.
- We also enhance the Turbulence Mitigation Transformer (TMT) by introducing a refined training strategy, an augmented input design that includes a temporally averaged frame as prior structural information, and a modified loss function that incorporates the Structural Similarity Index (SSIM).
- Overall, this study provides an in-depth evaluation of deep learning methods for turbulence reduction and offers practical guidance for selecting models in different imaging environments.
Sources (1)
- [1]Deep Learning for Atmospheric Turbulence Mitigation: A Comparison Between GANs and TransformersarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 13, 10:50 PM
This work compares two deep learning methods for turbulence reduction: Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Transformer-based models.
Atmospheric turbulence creates complex spatial and temporal distortions that significantly reduce image quality.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 13, 2026Dyna-2: General Purpose Physical Agents with Hour-Long Autonomy — Jason Ma, Dyna Robotics
- Oct 13, 2026Run fast, private agents on-device with LFM2.5-24B-A2B
- Oct 13, 2026Gemini 4 Argon: Built to solve your hardest problems
- Oct 13, 2026black-forest-labs/flux-3-image-klein-comfy
- Oct 13, 2026Copy-Paste Language Models
- Oct 12, 2026Cross-Market Meta-Learning for Electricity Price Forecasting