Risk-Controlled DFT Selection for Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials

Key points

• Pretrained machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) approximate DFT cheaply, but their errors vary by orders of magnitude across configurations, making it difficult to decide when to trust the MLIP predictions and when to fall back to DFT.1
• We frame this decision as a risk-controlled selection problem and solve it within a conformal risk control (CRC) framework.1
• Each configuration is mapped from atomic numbers and Cartesian coordinates to a fixed geometric descriptor, which a lightweight predictor uses to estimate an MLIP-DFT disagreement score in energy, average force, and maximum force.1
• Under an identical guarantee across eight dataset-MLIP pairs, our predictor routes 7% and 14% fewer configurations to DFT at $α=0.3$ than committee baselines.1

Sources (1)

• [1]Risk-Controlled DFT Selection for Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials
  arXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 14, 06:00 AM

  Automated materials discovery requires evaluating large pools of candidate configurations, with density functional theory (DFT) as a major throughput bottleneck.

  Pretrained machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) approximate DFT cheaply, but their errors vary by orders of magnitude across configurations, making it difficult to decide when to trust the MLIP predictions and when to fall back to DFT.

Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.