Model What Matters: Decision-Guided Selective World Modeling for Language Agents
We propose DGS-WM (Decision-Guided Selective World Modeling), a decision-guided policy-world modeling co-training approach for language agents.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Reinforcement learning provides a direct mechanism for optimizing task objectives in large language model-driven agents, but task rewards are typically sparse trajectory-level signals that only evaluate task success, without directly supervising action-conditioned environment transitions, leaving the model with limited explicit understanding of action consequences and environment dynamics.
- Recent work introduces auxiliary supervision through policy and world modeling co-training, yet typically treats complete environmental observations uniformly as world modeling targets, overlooking the varying decision relevance of observation content.
- DGS-WM employs a Decision-Guided Observation Selection component that filters observation units with decision value as world modeling targets based on their support for subsequent policy responses, and a Confidence-Adaptive Weighting component that adaptively adjusts supervision strength according to the model's prediction confidence on selected targets.
- Across multiple benchmarks covering single-hop/multi-hop question answering and interactive web tasks, DGS-WM achieves consistent improvements under different model scales and RL algorithms, demonstrating more stable and effective performance compared to full-observation world modeling methods.
Sources (1)
- [1]Model What Matters: Decision-Guided Selective World Modeling for Language AgentsarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 14, 06:11 AM
We propose DGS-WM (Decision-Guided Selective World Modeling), a decision-guided policy-world modeling co-training approach for language agents.
Reinforcement learning provides a direct mechanism for optimizing task objectives in large language model-driven agents, but task rewards are typically sparse trajectory-level signals that only evaluate task success, without directly supervising action-conditioned environment transitions, leaving the model with limited explicit understanding of action consequences and environment dynamics.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 13, 2026Run fast, private agents on-device with LFM2.5-24B-A2B
- Oct 13, 2026Fish Audio Drama 3 Technical Report
- Oct 13, 2026Urbex: Agentic Spatial Grounding for City-Scale 3D Scenes
- Oct 13, 2026GroundGUI: GUI Grounding by High-Quality Data and Distillation-to-Reinforcement Learning
- Oct 13, 2026Agent-Reflex: Teaching Language Agents to Act Reflectively
- Oct 12, 2026Z.ai GLM-Legal Beats Claude Fable 5 and Kimi K3 on Harvey LAB