SDPAD: A Fully Spike-Driven Pipeline for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
We present SDPAD, a fully spike-driven end-to-end planning pipeline that closes this gap.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- End-to-end autonomous driving demands trajectory planners that are both highly accurate and cheap enough for edge deployment.
- State-of-the-art artificial neural network (ANN) planners meet the accuracy requirement at the cost of heavy dense computation, while spiking neural networks (SNNs)---though promising orders-of-magnitude energy savings through sparse, event-driven arithmetic---still lag far behind in planning accuracy.
- On the nuScenes open-loop benchmark, SDPAD achieves an average $L2$ error of 0.40\,m and a collision rate of 0.12%, on par with strong ANN planners while consuming 69.9\,mJ---less than 2% of recent ANN baselines.
- To our knowledge, SDPAD is the first fully spike-driven planner evaluated in end-to-end autonomous driving, demonstrating that SNNs can rival dense ANNs in complex driving tasks.
Sources (1)
- [1]SDPAD: A Fully Spike-Driven Pipeline for End-to-End Autonomous DrivingarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 8, 09:33 AM
We present SDPAD, a fully spike-driven end-to-end planning pipeline that closes this gap.
End-to-end autonomous driving demands trajectory planners that are both highly accurate and cheap enough for edge deployment.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 8, 2026One Block, Multiple Depths: Recurrent Vision Transformers with Depth-Programmed Experts
- Oct 7, 2026MotherTree: Meta-learning on synthetic data improves decision tree training
- Oct 7, 2026Cache the Encoder Within:Compact, Reusable Memory across LLM Queries
- Oct 7, 2026TR-PTQ: High-Accuracy Integer-Only Transformer Post Training Quantization via Taylor Region Reformulation
- Oct 6, 2026huggingface/transformers v5.19.0: Release v5.19.0
- Oct 6, 2026EmbeddingGemma 2: an open, lightweight multimodal embedding model