Beyond Marginal Influence: Interaction-Aware Memory Selection for LLM Agents
LLM-agent memory selection often uses retrieval rankings based on record relevance or individual influence.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- We study per-decision memory sufficiency: selecting a small subset that preserves full-memory behavior.
- To separate search error from model error, we introduce JointCoreBench, a benchmark with nine interaction families, six workflow domains, natural-language decisions, and exact sufficient-set oracles, and JointCore, a relevance cost-ordered group-deletion baseline that tests blocks before individual records.
- Both methods preserve full-memory behavior under the deterministic primary interface.
- Tests with physical deletion, UNKNOWN masks, PENDING sentinels, counterfactual values, and alternative labels identify interface dependent behavior.
Sources (1)
- [1]Beyond Marginal Influence: Interaction-Aware Memory Selection for LLM AgentsarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 16, 10:37 AM
LLM-agent memory selection often uses retrieval rankings based on record relevance or individual influence.
We study per-decision memory sufficiency: selecting a small subset that preserves full-memory behavior.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 16, 2026MLLM Frame Subset Ensembling for Audio-Visual Video QA and MLLM-based Reranking for Ad-hoc Video Search in TRECVID 2025
- Oct 16, 2026MetaCurate: Evolving Curation Filters for High-Quality Agentic Coding Data
- Oct 15, 2026AlphaBet: Reinforcement Learning for LLM Event Forecasting Agents
- Oct 15, 2026anthropics/claude-code v2.1.301
- Oct 15, 2026Learning to Steer LLM Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
- Oct 15, 2026CertEx: Exact Visual Retrieval at Scale by Certified Exclusion