Which Long Documents Matter? A Controlled Study of Data Selection for Context Extension
Natural long documents are widely used for context extension, but which selection pipelines are effective remains unclear.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Random sampling of natural long documents (random-long) outperforms repacking at longer evaluation lengths.
- Within the same candidate pool, selecting documents with high LongPPL key-token density yields further gains, unlike the evaluated generic-quality and LLM-judge selectors.
- We introduce truncLongPPL to reduce scoring cost by computing key-token density over a truncated prefix.
- After supervised fine-tuning (SFT), Qwen3-8B and OLMo 3-7B models trained with selected long documents outperform their random-long counterparts by 1.13--1.67 points on LongBench v2 and 0.62--1.44 points on MRCR.
Sources (1)
- [1]Which Long Documents Matter? A Controlled Study of Data Selection for Context ExtensionarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 17, 05:29 AM
Natural long documents are widely used for context extension, but which selection pipelines are effective remains unclear.
Random sampling of natural long documents (random-long) outperforms repacking at longer evaluation lengths.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 17, 2026IF-MAP: Influence-Function-Inspired Agent Prioritization in Multi-Agent Systems
- Oct 17, 2026EdgeKernelBench: Unified LLM-Driven Kernel Generation for Edge Backends
- Oct 16, 2026Hugging Face ❤️ TorchTPU: TPUs, Natively
- Oct 16, 2026axolotl-ai-cloud/axolotl v0.21.0
- Oct 15, 2026The Ephemeral Cost of Switching Optimizers Across LLM Training Stages
- Oct 15, 2026Granite Switch 4.1: Chat, Decisions, and Speech from One Endpoint