CALM: Consistency-Aware Logit Masking in Decoding Space for Mitigating Overthinking of Large Reasoning Models
We propose consistency-aware logit masking (CALM), a training-free decoding intervention for mitigating overthinking in LRMs. CALM first monitors trial answers at step boundaries and then applies logit masking to action transition point (ATP) tokens such as "Wait", "Alternatively", and "Hmm", suppressing redundant transitional reasoning while allowing the model to continue its thought process more naturally.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Large reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved strong performance on challenging mathematical and scientific tasks through long chain-of-thought reasoning, but they often suffer from overthinking with unnecessary reasoning steps.
- Existing truncation-based methods typically detect consecutive trial-answer agreement and force early exit, yet such local stopping signals do not necessarily indicate final-answer stability and can disrupt useful subsequent reflection or verification, potentially leading to performance degradation.
- Experiments across four advanced LRMs and five benchmarks show that CALM reduces token consumption by 18.6%-25.0% compared with full CoT reasoning while maintaining performance, and can even improve accuracy by 0.07%-1.48% by reducing redundant reasoning.
- LLM-as-a-Judge results also demonstrate that CALM provides more coherent and concise results.
Sources (1)
- [1]CALM: Consistency-Aware Logit Masking in Decoding Space for Mitigating Overthinking of Large Reasoning ModelsarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 19, 07:10 AM
We propose consistency-aware logit masking (CALM), a training-free decoding intervention for mitigating overthinking in LRMs. CALM first monitors trial answers at step boundaries and then applies logit masking to action transition point (ATP) tokens such as "Wait", "Alternatively", and "Hmm", suppressing redundant transitional reasoning while allowing the model to continue its thought process more
Large reasoning models (LRMs) have achieved strong performance on challenging mathematical and scientific tasks through long chain-of-thought reasoning, but they often suffer from overthinking with unnecessary reasoning steps.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 19, 2026CoMem: Learning to Anticipate Failures from Retrieved Experience
- Oct 19, 2026Computation, Not Memory: Chain-of-Thought and State Tracking in LLM Agents
- Oct 17, 2026CoTs remain monitorable when being unfaithful requires computation: Replicating and Extending the Necessity Effect Across Eleven Models
- Oct 16, 2026SLA-LENS: From Classroom Transcripts to CSLA-Informed and Evidence-Linked L2 Interaction Analytics
- Oct 16, 2026Verbalising Model's Computation for Chain-of-Thought Faithfulness Detection
- Oct 16, 2026Not All Test-Time Compute Is Evidence: Model-Specific Bias in LLM Reasoning