Web Scale on a Budget: Tail-Aware Retrieval Evaluation
We show the web-scale indexing price is largely avoidable: evaluation itself obeys a scaling law.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- A common practice in instance retrieval is to grow the gallery size to improve a benchmark's discrimination capability.
- We define the per-query retrieval hardness, a gallery-scale agnostic quantity that yields a retrieval metric at any scale, and demonstrate it can be derived from a small random sample.
- The underlying sampled-rank machinery is long established in recommender-system and biometric evaluation, but to our knowledge has never been adapted to visual retrieval.
- We release code and the per-query hardness to facilitate faster, cheaper, and greener retrieval evaluation.
Sources (1)
- [1]Web Scale on a Budget: Tail-Aware Retrieval EvaluationarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 13, 08:54 AM
We show the web-scale indexing price is largely avoidable: evaluation itself obeys a scaling law.
A common practice in instance retrieval is to grow the gallery size to improve a benchmark's discrimination capability.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 13, 2026Fish Audio Drama 3 Technical Report
- Oct 13, 2026Many Right Answers, One Training Example: Removing Responder Noise from GRPO for LLM Recommenders
- Oct 13, 2026DeltaTTG: Training Multi-Turn Agents with a Token-to-Go Progress Meter
- Oct 12, 2026[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
- Oct 11, 2026Apple launches HomeView, its first smart display for the home
- Oct 11, 2026Putting Earth AI to work: Geospatial agents for our planet's biggest challenges