Dimension-Free Scaling Laws for Size Generalization: An Exponential Separation
Letting $n$ denote the number of training samples, we show that polynomial source decay is insufficient for efficient size generalization: while it yields error $n^{-Θ(1)}$ and hence polynomial sample complexity for in-domain learning, size-generalization error decays only as $(\log n)^{-Θ(1)}$, yielding an exponential separation.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Modern machine learning models increasingly operate on variable-size structured data, such as sets and graphs.
- Although extensive work has established when models on sets and graphs can be transferred across input sizes, such results do not characterize the statistical cost of doing so: the sample complexity of size generalization, and its relationship to classical in-domain learning, remain largely unknown.
- We develop a statistical learning theory of size generalization and establish a sharp exponential separation in sample complexity.
- To our knowledge, this work provides the first dimension-free minimax theory of size generalization and a rigorous characterization of when, and at what statistical cost, learning can transfer across input sizes.
Sources (1)
- [1]Dimension-Free Scaling Laws for Size Generalization: An Exponential SeparationarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 13, 10:55 PM
Letting $n$ denote the number of training samples, we show that polynomial source decay is insufficient for efficient size generalization: while it yields error $n^{-Θ(1)}$ and hence polynomial sample complexity for in-domain learning, size-generalization error decays only as $(\log n)^{-Θ(1)}$, yielding an exponential separation.
Modern machine learning models increasingly operate on variable-size structured data, such as sets and graphs.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 13, 2026Discrete Diffusion Models are Minimax Optimal Under Sparsity
- Oct 13, 2026Minimax rates for pointwise CATE estimation: the role of design smoothness
- Oct 13, 2026Recalibrating Many Questions with Few Labels: Minimax Rates and Identification Limits
- Oct 13, 2026Rarity Determines Minimax Rates of Semantic Entropy From Weak Pairwise Judgments With a Known Channel
- Oct 12, 2026Image Tokenizers Should Be Trained Between Images
- Oct 12, 2026Online Individualized Treatment Selection under Partial Feedback: False Discovery Control and Minimax Optimality