C3: Rethinking Process Supervision via Confidence-Guided Credit Correction in Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning
To address this issue, we propose Confidence-Guided Credit Correction (C$^3$), a plug-in method for local credit correction.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Large language models are increasingly trained as multi-turn agents that interact with external tools.
- However, outcome-only reinforcement learning can produce a form of misguided reinforcement: even on successful trajectories, undesirable local behaviors may receive positive token-level advantages and be favored by the policy update.
- Across multiple multi-turn benchmarks, C$^3$ improves performance under both {critic-based and critic-free reinforcement learning methods}.
- Our results show that local credit correction provides an effective form of process supervision for outcome-driven RL.
Sources (1)
- [1]C3: Rethinking Process Supervision via Confidence-Guided Credit Correction in Multi-Turn Reinforcement LearningarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 14, 07:18 AM
To address this issue, we propose Confidence-Guided Credit Correction (C$^3$), a plug-in method for local credit correction.
Large language models are increasingly trained as multi-turn agents that interact with external tools.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 14, 2026ForkGRPO: Efficient Exploration and Fine-Grained Credit Assignment for Diffusion Language Models
- Oct 14, 2026Beyond Corrected Actions: Training LLM Agents on Textual Critiques
- Oct 14, 2026The Design Space of Tri-Modal Masked Diffusion Models
- Oct 13, 2026Agent-Reflex: Teaching Language Agents to Act Reflectively
- Oct 13, 2026Beyond the Verdict: Agentic Code Judging with Verifiable Feedback
- Oct 12, 2026Reinforcement Learning In Partially Verifiable Environments for Colon Cancer Treatment Planning