Comparative Evaluation of Deep-Learning based DoA Estimators for Real-Time ISAC Beamforming
Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) systems rely on accurate Direction-of-Arrival (DoA) estimation for effective beamforming and spectral-efficiency enhancement.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- While numerous classical and deep-learning-based DoA estimation methods have been reported in the literature, their suitability for real-time ISAC operation remains insufficiently understood because practical deployment requires consideration of both estimation accuracy and computational latency.
- This paper presents a unified evaluation framework for systematically comparing classical and learning-based DoA estimators within an ISAC beamforming pipeline.
- The impact of DoA estimation accuracy, inference latency, beamforming-weight generation time, and resulting effective spectral efficiency is investigated.
- Among the evaluated methods, the Regression Convolutional Neural Network (RCNN) exhibits a favorable balance between estimation accuracy, computational efficiency, and beamforming performance, making it a promising candidate for real-time ISAC deployment.
Sources (1)
- [1]Comparative Evaluation of Deep-Learning based DoA Estimators for Real-Time ISAC BeamformingarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 14, 03:11 PM
Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) systems rely on accurate Direction-of-Arrival (DoA) estimation for effective beamforming and spectral-efficiency enhancement.
While numerous classical and deep-learning-based DoA estimation methods have been reported in the literature, their suitability for real-time ISAC operation remains insufficiently understood because practical deployment requires consideration of both estimation accuracy and computational latency.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 13, 2026Correction Training for Diffusion Models
- Oct 13, 2026Run fast, private agents on-device with LFM2.5-24B-A2B
- Oct 13, 2026Gemini 4 Argon for Robotics
- Oct 13, 2026inclusionAI/Ling-3.1-flash
- Oct 13, 2026Hybrid Reasoning Agents
- Oct 13, 2026CLASHarness: Benchmarking Multi-Agent Conflict in Computer Use via a Controllable and Verifiable Generation Pipeline