Are We Overthinking One-Step Generation?
In this work, we introduce Priming Models, a simple two-stage framework for training one-step generators.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Diffusion and flow matching are now dominant frameworks for generative modeling in continuous domains, but they typically require multiple network evaluations at inference.
- Motivated by the difficulty of distributional training from scratch, Priming Models are first trained on a reconstruction objective, e.g., pixel-space denoising at a fixed noise level, before undergoing feature-space distributional post-training.
- Empirically, across class-conditional image generation, text-to-image generation, and world modeling, Priming Models significantly advance the Pareto frontier of training compute vs. generation quality.
- On ImageNet at $256 \times 256$ resolution, we achieve a state-of-the-art FID of $1.19$ among one-step generators using approximately one-tenth the training compute of prior methods with comparable FID.
Sources (1)
- [1]Are We Overthinking One-Step Generation?arXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 14, 03:14 PM
In this work, we introduce Priming Models, a simple two-stage framework for training one-step generators.
Diffusion and flow matching are now dominant frameworks for generative modeling in continuous domains, but they typically require multiple network evaluations at inference.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 14, 2026ReaDy: Recurrent States as Dynamic Context for Speculative Drafting in Hybrid Linear Attention Large Language Models
- Oct 14, 2026Self-Conditioning Enables Deep Sequential Reasoning in Flow Matching
- Oct 13, 2026Interaction Latents as Actions for Contact-Rich Manipulation
- Oct 13, 2026Run fast, private agents on-device with LFM2.5-24B-A2B
- Oct 13, 2026ForeTac: Predictive Contact Guidance for Generative Robot Policies
- Oct 13, 2026PrT-Flow: Probability-Tractable Flow Matching for Reinforcement Learning