ResearchResearch paperEfficiency & Inference · Training & Scaling1 source · Oct 15, 2026

Noise-shaped Sampling and Annealing for Scalable On-the-edge Training of Binary and Ternary AI Models

The training loss of binary and ternary neural networks, expanded as a multilinear polynomial over the discrete weights, is structurally equivalent to the energy of a hierarchical high-order Ising model.

Key points

  • We exploit this equivalence to apply Ising solvers to discrete-weight network training, while accounting for a fundamental difference in objectives: an Ising solver seeks the ground state of a fixed energy function, whereas training seeks solutions that generalize to unseen data.
  • Our key contribution is $ΣΔ$-Sampler, an optimizer that reconciles these objectives by embedding a stochastic sampling-and-annealing step as a noisy quantizer inside a first-order $ΣΔ$ noise-shaping loop.
  • The loop pushes noise from weight quantization, high-order frustration, and mini-batch sampling out of the low-frequency adaptation band, so that discrete weight updates follow the smooth descent trajectories embedded in the rugged loss landscape.
  • Compared with standard quantization-aware training, $ΣΔ$-Sampler reduces the training memory footprint by over $50%$, delivers an order-of-magnitude speed-up, and reduces weight-update memory traffic by four orders of magnitude, making it attractive for on-device training and fine-tuning of large binary and ternary models.

Sources (1)

  • [1]Noise-shaped Sampling and Annealing for Scalable On-the-edge Training of Binary and Ternary AI Models
    arXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 15, 08:23 PM
    The training loss of binary and ternary neural networks, expanded as a multilinear polynomial over the discrete weights, is structurally equivalent to the energy of a hierarchical high-order Ising model.
    We exploit this equivalence to apply Ising solvers to discrete-weight network training, while accounting for a fundamental difference in objectives: an Ising solver seeks the ground state of a fixed energy function, whereas training seeks solutions that generalize to unseen data.

Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.

Before this

  1. Oct 15, 2026Pearl-Chat: Engineering a native Luganda language model from first principles in JAX and Flax NNX
  2. Oct 15, 2026NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL Powers Specialized Agents with Multimodal Reasoning
  3. Oct 15, 2026RoleQ: Role-Aligned Scales for Converting Language Models to Ternary
  4. Oct 15, 2026Local and Distributed Large LLM Inference with MLX and RDMA on Mac Studio
  5. Oct 15, 2026Welcome FLUX.3 Image Klein in Diffusers
  6. Oct 15, 2026Learning to Think and Explore in 3D World

Related