Watermarkability: Measuring and Improving Language-Model Compatibility with Logit-Based Watermarks
We introduce watermarkability to characterize the compatibility between a model and the token sets requested by a watermark.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Language-model watermarks can help identify model-generated text, encode provenance information, and detect post-generation edits.
- A broad class of logit-based watermarks increases the logits of a designated token set at each decoding step.
- At a target mass $τ$, we quantify this property through a watermarkability cost: the expected minimum KL divergence from the base-model distribution required to assign probability at least $τ$ to the requested set.
- Across the 12 model-schedule pairs, the pre-adaptation watermarkability cost correlates with the log-PPL increase under a near-hard fixed-bias baseline (pooled Pearson $r=0.929$).
Sources (1)
- [1]Watermarkability: Measuring and Improving Language-Model Compatibility with Logit-Based WatermarksarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 16, 01:40 AM
We introduce watermarkability to characterize the compatibility between a model and the token sets requested by a watermark.
Language-model watermarks can help identify model-generated text, encode provenance information, and detect post-generation edits.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 15, 2026Pearl-Chat: Engineering a native Luganda language model from first principles in JAX and Flax NNX
- Oct 15, 2026Designing Transformers for Continuous Diffusion Language Models
- Oct 15, 2026The Density of Thought: Predicting and Steering Reasoning in Large Language Models
- Oct 15, 2026SUPRA-TEX: 3D Generation with Super-Aligned Texture
- Oct 14, 2026Two-Stage Score Estimation for Group-Specific Diffusion Models
- Oct 14, 2026Beyond Expert Rankings: Contrast Calibration for Mixed-Precision MoE Quantization