From Approval to Abuse: Privilege Escalation Attacks on Harness-Protected Coding Agents
Coding agents use execution harnesses to constrain the consequences of prompt injection by enforcing permission boundaries.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- In this work, we show that this mechanism introduces a new risk: untrusted context can influence the permissions presented for approval, with consequences extending beyond the immediate task.
- We investigate privilege escalation targeting this permission-update process.
- Across production platforms, including Claude Code and Codex CLI, we demonstrate that agents successfully elicit the target allow-rules in 58% of experimental instances.
- To further quantify the downstream risk, we show that conditional on rule approval, our exploit achieves verified, silent goal completion in 47 of the 58 eligible instances (81.0%), undermining the safety promise of human-in-the-loop oversight.
Sources (1)
- [1]From Approval to Abuse: Privilege Escalation Attacks on Harness-Protected Coding AgentsarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 16, 06:13 AM
Coding agents use execution harnesses to constrain the consequences of prompt injection by enforcing permission boundaries.
In this work, we show that this mechanism introduces a new risk: untrusted context can influence the permissions presented for approval, with consequences extending beyond the immediate task.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 15, 2026TokenEconomizer: Experience-Driven Black-Box Cost Control for Coding Agents
- Oct 15, 2026anthropics/claude-code v2.1.301
- Oct 15, 2026unslothai/unsloth v0.1.908-beta: NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 + Meta Muse Spark Open
- Oct 15, 2026Prompt tips from Anthropic
- Oct 14, 2026Screwtape: Adversarial Transcript Editing for Monitor Red-Teaming
- Oct 14, 2026P2Patch: Exploit-Guided Vulnerability Repair