Physics Foundation Models for Efficient Control of Fluid Flows
We investigate whether a physics foundation model (PFM) pretrained for PDE forecasting can be repurposed for closed-loop fluid-flow control.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- We construct a PFM-based controller by attaching lightweight Gaussian actor and critic heads to frozen pretrained representations and train the policy using proximal policy optimization (PPO).
- We evaluate the approach on HydroGym's two-dimensional Kolmogorov-flow environment using vorticity observations at \(64\times64\) and \(128\times128\) resolutions and Reynolds numbers \(Re=100\) and \(200\).
- Across these settings, we compare the frozen PFM controller against a baseline MLP policy trained with the same PPO framework.
- These results provide initial evidence that representations learned through self-supervised next-frame prediction can be transferred directly to closed-loop fluid flow control.
Sources (1)
- [1]Physics Foundation Models for Efficient Control of Fluid FlowsarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 10, 08:51 PM
We investigate whether a physics foundation model (PFM) pretrained for PDE forecasting can be repurposed for closed-loop fluid-flow control.
We construct a PFM-based controller by attaching lightweight Gaussian actor and critic heads to frozen pretrained representations and train the policy using proximal policy optimization (PPO).
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 10, 2026CFG-Policy: Unified Diffusion Policy Learning Framework via Classifier-free Guidance
- Oct 10, 2026EviScene: Beyond "Is It AI?" for Agentic Image Factuality Assessment
- Oct 10, 2026LightVAE: Towards Compact and Efficient Video Autoencoders
- Oct 9, 2026Work2Skill: Capturing Human GUI Experience for Reusable Agent Skill Induction
- Oct 8, 2026openai/codex rust-v0.162.0: 0.162.0
- Oct 8, 2026Understanding Jev, the new model everyone is talking about