The Development of Sycophancy in Language Models: Tracing Vulnerabilities from Pretraining to Post-Training
Language models can change a committed answer to accommodate a user's opinion or pushback without new evidence.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- However, when this behaviour develops during training and what a released model inherits from earlier stages remain unclear.
- We follow 741 checkpoints of 30 open model lineages, from early pretraining to released models.
- Beyond responses without pressure, pretraining behaviour predicts little of which questions a released model yields on.
- That pattern forms during post-training: on routes with supervised fine-tuning, the fine-tuning checkpoint predicts part of it and the preference-optimization checkpoint most of it.
Sources (1)
- [1]The Development of Sycophancy in Language Models: Tracing Vulnerabilities from Pretraining to Post-TrainingarXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 19, 04:13 PM
Language models can change a committed answer to accommodate a user's opinion or pushback without new evidence.
However, when this behaviour develops during training and what a released model inherits from earlier stages remain unclear.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 19, 2026TorchNeuron: running HF models on AWS Trainium is easier than ever
- Oct 19, 2026TokenGate: Adapting LLMs for Fast and Memory-Efficient Prefill with Learned Token Pruning
- Oct 18, 2026ViCoR: Estimating Visual Necessity via Counterfactual Residuals for Multimodal Medical Data Selection
- Oct 18, 2026Dual-Slot: From Serial Loops to Parallel Slots in Language Models
- Oct 18, 2026PACT: NVFP4 Data-Flow LoRA Fine-Tuning on Consumer GPUs
- Oct 16, 2026Hugging Face ❤️ TorchTPU: TPUs, Natively