Enhancing Multimodal RLVR with Pairwise Token Contrast and Adaptive Trajectory Confidence
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves multimodal reasoning, but group-relative policy optimization broadcasts a single sequence-level advantage to every token of a response, although errors usually localize to a few decisive steps.
ProofPaper ↗
Key points
- Recent self-distilled variants refine credit with a teacher--student likelihood gap.
- To address this, we propose Pairwise token contrast and Adaptive trajectory ConfidencE (PACE).
- Pairwise token contrast scores each response under four teacher views, crossing a correct or incorrect answer hint with the image present or removed, and compares the two hints for every token, which cancels shifts shared by both hints and reveals whether the token's support relies on the image.
- Experiments show that both components matter: replacing pairwise token contrast with a single-view signal underperforms our method, while adaptive trajectory confidence adds further improvement.
Sources (1)
- [1]Enhancing Multimodal RLVR with Pairwise Token Contrast and Adaptive Trajectory ConfidencearXiv (AI, ML, NLP, CV, robotics, multi-agent) · Oct 15, 10:55 AM
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves multimodal reasoning, but group-relative policy optimization broadcasts a single sequence-level advantage to every token of a response, although errors usually localize to a few decisive steps.
Recent self-distilled variants refine credit with a teacher--student likelihood gap.
Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.
Before this
- Oct 15, 2026Welcome FLUX.3 Image Klein in Diffusers
- Oct 14, 2026Failure Is the Mother of Success: Recovering Supervision with Grounding Hindsight
- Oct 14, 2026Gibbs-Gap Policy Optimization for Off-Policy RL with Verifiable Rewards
- Oct 14, 2026Hindsight-Privileged RLVR: Single-Rollout Token Credit Without Group Sampling
- Oct 14, 2026RM-OPD: On-Policy Distillation for Generative Reward Models
- Oct 13, 2026Two Clocks: Why Larger Rollout Batches Learn Slower but Fail on Schedule in Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards