ResearchResearch paperSafety & Alignment · Agents & Tool Use · Evaluation & Benchmarks1 source · Oct 15, 2026

CodeHealth Predicts the Token Cost of Agentic Code Review: A Pre-Registered Study of 465 Agent-Authored Pull Requests

Objective: We test whether baseline CodeHealth predicts the token cost of agentic review and fix beyond pull request (PR) footprint.

Key points

  • Context: Organizations increasingly delegate code review to multi-agent large language model (LLM) pipelines billed per token.
  • Method: In a pre-registered observational study, we sampled 465 agent-authored PRs from 246 repositories in AIDev, jointly stratified by CodeHealth and footprint under repository caps.
  • A frozen five-agent review-and-fix pipeline processed every PR with three different LLMs. Per LLM, we fitted a mixed model of log tokens on CodeHealth and log PR footprint, with a repository random intercept.
  • Conclusions: A quality metric calibrated against human maintainability also predicts the inference cost of multi-agent review and fix.

Sources (1)

Extractive summary: sentences quoted from the sources.

Before this

  1. Oct 15, 2026Decomposing Brain-LLM Alignment with Interpretable Semantic Representations
  2. Oct 15, 2026MemCut: Every Secret Leaves a Trail in the Long-Term Memory of LLM Agents
  3. Oct 15, 2026JevAgentHarness: Benchmarking, Deploying and Training Decision Models That Share Control with LLMs
  4. Oct 15, 2026GlobeBench: Evaluating Text-Based World Model Capabilities for Scalable Environment Simulations
  5. Oct 15, 2026Librarian Agents: Training LLMs to Curate Long-Context Workspaces that Anticipate Future Queries
  6. Oct 15, 2026Sci$Π$vot: Benchmarking Principal-Investigator Judgment at Pivotal Moments of Scientific AutoResearch Agents

Related